*Note: This document links directly to relevant areas found in the [system design topics](https://github.com/donnemartin/system-design-primer#index-of-system-design-topics) to avoid duplication. Refer to the linked content for general talking points, tradeoffs, and alternatives.*
> Ask questions to clarify use cases and constraints.
> Discuss assumptions.
Without an interviewer to address clarifying questions, we'll define some use cases and constraints.
### Use cases
#### We'll scope the problem to handle only the following use cases
* **Service** crawls a list of urls:
* Generates reverse index of words to pages containing the search terms
* Generates titles and snippets for pages
* Title and snippets are static, they do not change based on search query
* **User** inputs a search term and sees a list of relevant pages with titles and snippets the crawler generated
* Only sketch high level components and interactions for this use case, no need to go into depth
* **Service** has high availability
#### Out of scope
* Search analytics
* Personalized search results
* Page rank
### Constraints and assumptions
#### State assumptions
* Traffic is not evenly distributed
* Some searches are very popular, while others are only executed once
* Support only anonymous users
* Generating search results should be fast
* The web crawler should not get stuck in an infinite loop
* We get stuck in an infinite loop if the graph contains a cycle
* 1 billion links to crawl
* Pages need to be crawled regularly to ensure freshness
* Average refresh rate of about once per week, more frequent for popular sites
* 4 billion links crawled each month
* Average stored size per web page: 500 KB
* For simplicity, count changes the same as new pages
* 100 billion searches per month
Exercise the use of more traditional systems - don't use existing systems such as [solr](http://lucene.apache.org/solr/) or [nutch](http://nutch.apache.org/).
#### Calculate usage
**Clarify with your interviewer if you should run back-of-the-envelope usage calculations.**
* 2 PB of stored page content per month
* 500 KB per page * 4 billion links crawled per month
* 72 PB of stored page content in 3 years
* 1,600 write requests per second
* 40,000 search requests per second
Handy conversion guide:
* 2.5 million seconds per month
* 1 request per second = 2.5 million requests per month
* 40 requests per second = 100 million requests per month
* 400 requests per second = 1 billion requests per month
## Step 2: Create a high level design
> Outline a high level design with all important components.
![Imgur](http://i.imgur.com/xjdAAUv.png)
## Step 3: Design core components
> Dive into details for each core component.
### Use case: Service crawls a list of urls
We'll assume we have an initial list of `links_to_crawl` ranked initially based on overall site popularity. If this is not a reasonable assumption, we can seed the crawler with popular sites that link to outside content such as [Yahoo](https://www.yahoo.com/), [DMOZ](http://www.dmoz.org/), etc
We'll use a table `crawled_links` to store processed links and their page signatures.
We could store `links_to_crawl` and `crawled_links` in a key-value **NoSQL Database**. For the ranked links in `links_to_crawl`, we could use [Redis](https://redis.io/) with sorted sets to maintain a ranking of page links. We should discuss the [use cases and tradeoffs between choosing SQL or NoSQL](https://github.com/donnemartin/system-design-primer#sql-or-nosql).
We need to be careful the web crawler doesn't get stuck in an infinite loop, which happens when the graph contains a cycle.
**Clarify with your interviewer how much code you are expected to write**.
We'll want to remove duplicate urls:
* For smaller lists we could use something like `sort | unique`
* With 1 billion links to crawl, we could use **MapReduce** to output only entries that have a frequency of 1
```
class RemoveDuplicateUrls(MRJob):
def mapper(self, _, line):
yield line, 1
def reducer(self, key, values):
total = sum(values)
if total == 1:
yield key, total
```
Detecting duplicate content is more complex. We could generate a signature based on the contents of the page and compare those two signatures for similarity. Some potential algorithms are [Jaccard index](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaccard_index) and [cosine similarity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosine_similarity).
### Determining when to update the crawl results
Pages need to be crawled regularly to ensure freshness. Crawl results could have a `timestamp` field that indicates the last time a page was crawled. After a default time period, say one week, all pages should be refreshed. Frequently updated or more popular sites could be refreshed in shorter intervals.
Although we won't dive into details on analytics, we could do some data mining to determine the mean time before a particular page is updated, and use that statistic to determine how often to re-crawl the page.
We might also choose to support a `Robots.txt` file that gives webmasters control of crawl frequency.
### Use case: User inputs a search term and sees a list of relevant pages with titles and snippets
* The **Client** sends a request to the **Web Server**, running as a [reverse proxy](https://github.com/donnemartin/system-design-primer#reverse-proxy-web-server)
State you would 1) **Benchmark/Load Test**, 2) **Profile** for bottlenecks 3) address bottlenecks while evaluating alternatives and trade-offs, and 4) repeat. See [Design a system that scales to millions of users on AWS](../scaling_aws/README.md) as a sample on how to iteratively scale the initial design.
It's important to discuss what bottlenecks you might encounter with the initial design and how you might address each of them. For example, what issues are addressed by adding a **Load Balancer** with multiple **Web Servers**? **CDN**? **Master-Slave Replicas**? What are the alternatives and **Trade-Offs** for each?
We'll introduce some components to complete the design and to address scalability issues. Internal load balancers are not shown to reduce clutter.
*To avoid repeating discussions*, refer to the following [system design topics](https://github.com/donnemartin/system-design-primer#index-of-system-design-topics) for main talking points, tradeoffs, and alternatives:
Some searches are very popular, while others are only executed once. Popular queries can be served from a **Memory Cache** such as Redis or Memcached to reduce response times and to avoid overloading the **Reverse Index Service** and **Document Service**. The **Memory Cache** is also useful for handling the unevenly distributed traffic and traffic spikes. Reading 1 MB sequentially from memory takes about 250 microseconds, while reading from SSD takes 4x and from disk takes 80x longer.<sup><ahref=https://github.com/donnemartin/system-design-primer#latency-numbers-every-programmer-should-know>1</a></sup>
Below are a few other optimizations to the **Crawling Service**:
* To handle the data size and request load, the **Reverse Index Service** and **Document Service** will likely need to make heavy use sharding and replication.
* DNS lookup can be a bottleneck, the **Crawler Service** can keep its own DNS lookup that is refreshed periodically
* The **Crawler Service** can improve performance and reduce memory usage by keeping many open connections at a time, referred to as [connection pooling](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connection_pool)
* External communication with clients - [HTTP APIs following REST](https://github.com/donnemartin/system-design-primer#representational-state-transfer-rest)