sombochea/system-design-primer
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

Add Sharding section

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Donne Martin 2017-02-28 05:03:08 -08:00
parent 18611be86c
commit c361ea12a5
1 changed files with 28 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

28
README.md
View File

@ -969,3 +969,31 @@ Federation (or functional partitioning) splits up databases by function. For ex
##### Source(s) and further reading: federation
* [Scaling up to your first 10 million users](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vg5onp8TU6Q)
#### Sharding
<p align="center">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/wU8x5Id.png">
<br/>
<i><a href=http://www.slideshare.net/jboner/scalability-availability-stability-patterns/>Source: Scalability, availability, stability, patterns</a></i>
</p>
Sharding distributes data across different databases such that each database can only manage a subset of the data. Taking a users database as an example, as the number of users increases, more shards are added to the cluster.
Similar to the advantages of [federation](#federation), sharding results in less read and write traffic, less replication, and more cache hits. Index size is also reduced, which generally improves performance with faster queries. If one shard goes down, the other shards are still operational, although you'll want to add some form of replication to avoid data loss. Like federation, there is no single central master serializing writes, allowing you to write in parallel with increased throughput.
Common ways to shard a table of users is either through the user's last name initial or the user's geographic location.
##### Disadvantage(s): sharding
* You'll need to update your application logic to work with shards, which could result in complex SQL queries.
* Data distribution can become lobsided in a shard. For example, a set of power users on a shard could result in increased load to that shard compared to others.
* Rebalancing adds additional complexity. A sharding function based on [consistent hashing](http://www.paperplanes.de/2011/12/9/the-magic-of-consistent-hashing.html) can reduce the amount of transferred data.
* Joining data from multiple shards is more complex.
* Sharding adds more hardware and additional complexity.
##### Source(s) and further reading: sharding
* [The coming of the shard](http://highscalability.com/blog/2009/8/6/an-unorthodox-approach-to-database-design-the-coming-of-the.html)
* [Shard database architecture](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shard_(database_architecture))
* [Consistent hashing](http://www.paperplanes.de/2011/12/9/the-magic-of-consistent-hashing.html)