system-design-primer/solutions/system_design/social_graph

Design the data structures for a social network

Note: This document links directly to relevant areas found in the system design topics to avoid duplication. Refer to the linked content for general talking points, tradeoffs, and alternatives.

Step 1: Outline use cases and constraints

Gather requirements and scope the problem. Ask questions to clarify use cases and constraints. Discuss assumptions.

Without an interviewer to address clarifying questions, we'll define some use cases and constraints.

Use cases

We'll scope the problem to handle only the following use cases

• User searches for someone and sees the shortest path to the searched person
• Service has high availability

Constraints and assumptions

State assumptions

• Traffic is not evenly distributed
  • Some searches are more popular than others, while others are only executed once
• Graph data won't fit on a single machine
• Graph edges are unweighted
• 100 million users
• 50 friends per user average
• 1 billion friend searches per month

Exercise the use of more traditional systems - don't use graph-specific solutions such as GraphQL or a graph database like Neo4j

Calculate usage

Clarify with your interviewer if you should run back-of-the-envelope usage calculations.

• 5 billion friend relationships
  • 100 million users * 50 friends per user average
• 400 search requests per second

Handy conversion guide:

• 2.5 million seconds per month
• 1 request per second = 2.5 million requests per month
• 40 requests per second = 100 million requests per month
• 400 requests per second = 1 billion requests per month

Step 2: Create a high level design

Outline a high level design with all important components.

Step 3: Design core components

Dive into details for each core component.

Use case: User searches for someone and sees the shortest path to the searched person

Clarify with your interviewer how much code you are expected to write.

Without the constraint of millions of users (vertices) and billions of friend relationships (edges), we could solve this unweighted shortest path task with a general BFS approach:

class Graph(Graph):

    def shortest_path(self, source, dest):
        if source is None or dest is None:
            return None
        if source is dest:
            return [source.key]
        prev_node_keys = self._shortest_path(source, dest)
        if prev_node_keys is None:
            return None
        else:
            path_ids = [dest.key]
            prev_node_key = prev_node_keys[dest.key]
            while prev_node_key is not None:
                path_ids.append(prev_node_key)
                prev_node_key = prev_node_keys[prev_node_key]
            return path_ids[::-1]

    def _shortest_path(self, source, dest):
        queue = deque()
        queue.append(source)
        prev_node_keys = {source.key: None}
        source.visit_state = State.visited
        while queue:
            node = queue.popleft()
            if node is dest:
                return prev_node_keys
            prev_node = node
            for adj_node in node.adj_nodes.values():
                if adj_node.visit_state == State.unvisited:
                    queue.append(adj_node)
                    prev_node_keys[adj_node.key] = prev_node.key
                    adj_node.visit_state = State.visited
        return None

We won't be able to fit all users on the same machine, we'll need to shard users across Person Servers and access them with a Lookup Service.

• The Client sends a request to the Web Server, running as a reverse proxy
• The Web Server forwards the request to the Search API server
• The Search API server forwards the request to the User Graph Service
• The User Graph Service does does the following:
  • Uses the Lookup Service to find the Person Server where the current user's info is stored
  • Finds the appropriate Person Server to retrieve the current user's list of friend_ids
  • Runs a BFS search using the current user as the source and the current user's friend_ids as the ids for each adjacent_node
  • To get the adjacent_node from a given id:
    • The User Graph Service will again need to communicate with the Lookup Service to determine which Person Server stores theadjacent_node matching the given id (potential for optimization)

Clarify with your interviewer how much code you should be writing.

Note: Error handling is excluded below for simplicity. Ask if you should code proper error handing.

Lookup Service implementation:

class LookupService(object):

    def __init__(self):
        self.lookup = self._init_lookup()  # key: person_id, value: person_server

    def _init_lookup(self):
        ...

    def lookup_person_server(self, person_id):
        return self.lookup[person_id]

Person Server implementation:

class PersonServer(object):

    def __init__(self):
        self.people = {}  # key: person_id, value: person

    def add_person(self, person):
        ...

    def people(self, ids):
        results = []
        for id in ids:
            if id in self.people:
                results.append(self.people[id])
        return results

Person implementation:

class Person(object):

    def __init__(self, id, name, friend_ids):
        self.id = id
        self.name = name
        self.friend_ids = friend_ids

User Graph Service implementation:

class UserGraphService(object):

    def __init__(self, lookup_service):
        self.lookup_service = lookup_service

    def person(self, person_id):
        person_server = self.lookup_service.lookup_person_server(person_id)
        return person_server.people([person_id])

    def shortest_path(self, source_key, dest_key):
        if source_key is None or dest_key is None:
            return None
        if source_key is dest_key:
            return [source_key]
        prev_node_keys = self._shortest_path(source_key, dest_key)
        if prev_node_keys is None:
            return None
        else:
            # Iterate through the path_ids backwards, starting at dest_key
            path_ids = [dest_key]
            prev_node_key = prev_node_keys[dest_key]
            while prev_node_key is not None:
                path_ids.append(prev_node_key)
                prev_node_key = prev_node_keys[prev_node_key]
            # Reverse the list since we iterated backwards
            return path_ids[::-1]

    def _shortest_path(self, source_key, dest_key, path):
        # Use the id to get the Person
        source = self.person(source_key)
        # Update our bfs queue
        queue = deque()
        queue.append(source)
        # prev_node_keys keeps track of each hop from
        # the source_key to the dest_key
        prev_node_keys = {source_key: None}
        # We'll use visited_ids to keep track of which nodes we've
        # visited, which can be different from a typical bfs where
        # this can be stored in the node itself
        visited_ids = set()
        visited_ids.add(source.id)
        while queue:
            node = queue.popleft()
            if node.key is dest_key:
                return prev_node_keys
            prev_node = node
            for friend_id in node.friend_ids:
                if friend_id not in visited_ids:
                    friend_node = self.person(friend_id)
                    queue.append(friend_node)
                    prev_node_keys[friend_id] = prev_node.key
                    visited_ids.add(friend_id)
        return None

We'll use a public REST API:

$ curl https://social.com/api/v1/friend_search?person_id=1234

Response:

{
    "person_id": "100",
    "name": "foo",
    "link": "https://social.com/foo",
},
{
    "person_id": "53",
    "name": "bar",
    "link": "https://social.com/bar",
},
{
    "person_id": "1234",
    "name": "baz",
    "link": "https://social.com/baz",
},

For internal communications, we could use Remote Procedure Calls.

Step 4: Scale the design

Identify and address bottlenecks, given the constraints.

Important: Do not simply jump right into the final design from the initial design!

State you would 1) Benchmark/Load Test, 2) Profile for bottlenecks 3) address bottlenecks while evaluating alternatives and trade-offs, and 4) repeat. See Design a system that scales to millions of users on AWS as a sample on how to iteratively scale the initial design.

It's important to discuss what bottlenecks you might encounter with the initial design and how you might address each of them. For example, what issues are addressed by adding a Load Balancer with multiple Web Servers? CDN? Master-Slave Replicas? What are the alternatives and Trade-Offs for each?

We'll introduce some components to complete the design and to address scalability issues. Internal load balancers are not shown to reduce clutter.

To avoid repeating discussions, refer to the following system design topics for main talking points, tradeoffs, and alternatives:

• DNS
• Load balancer
• Horizontal scaling
• Web server (reverse proxy)
• API server (application layer)
• Cache
• Consistency patterns
• Availability patterns

To address the constraint of 400 average read requests per second (higher at peak), person data can be served from a Memory Cache such as Redis or Memcached to reduce response times and to reduce traffic to downstream services. This could be especially useful for people who do multiple searches in succession and for people who are well-connected. Reading 1 MB sequentially from memory takes about 250 microseconds, while reading from SSD takes 4x and from disk takes 80x longer.¹

Below are further optimizations:

• Store complete or partial BFS traversals to speed up subsequent lookups in the Memory Cache
• Batch compute offline then store complete or partial BFS traversals to speed up subsequent lookups in a NoSQL Database
• Reduce machine jumps by batching together friend lookups hosted on the same Person Server
  • Shard Person Servers by location to further improve this, as friends generally live closer to each other
• Do two BFS searches at the same time, one starting from the source, and one from the destination, then merge the two paths
• Start the BFS search from people with large numbers of friends, as they are more likely to reduce the number of degrees of separation between the current user and the search target
• Set a limit based on time or number of hops before asking the user if they want to continue searching, as searching could take a considerable amount of time in some cases
• Use a Graph Database such as Neo4j or a graph-specific query language such as GraphQL (if there were no constraint preventing the use of Graph Databases)

Additional talking points

Additional topics to dive into, depending on the problem scope and time remaining.

SQL scaling patterns

• Read replicas
• Federation
• Sharding
• Denormalization
• SQL Tuning

NoSQL

• Key-value store
• Document store
• Wide column store
• Graph database
• SQL vs NoSQL

Caching

• Where to cache
  • Client caching
  • CDN caching
  • Web server caching
  • Database caching
  • Application caching
• What to cache
  • Caching at the database query level
  • Caching at the object level
• When to update the cache
  • Cache-aside
  • Write-through
  • Write-behind (write-back)
  • Refresh ahead

Asynchronism and microservices

• Message queues
• Task queues
• Back pressure
• Microservices

Communications

• Discuss tradeoffs:
  • External communication with clients - HTTP APIs following REST
  • Internal communications - RPC
• Service discovery

Security

Refer to the security section.

Latency numbers

See Latency numbers every programmer should know.

Ongoing

• Continue benchmarking and monitoring your system to address bottlenecks as they come up
• Scaling is an iterative process